¿NADIE VA A PENSAR EN LOS (PROBABLEMENTE) FALSOS NIÑOS?
Otra falsa bandera
Autor: James Delingpole
Nota original: https://delingpole.substack.com/p/will-no-one-think-of-the-probably
En inglés al pie.
Aquí hay un comentario de un artículo anterior que escribí expresando escepticismo sobre una historia ampliamente difundida sobre la supuesta masacre de jóvenes fanáticos de Taylor Swift en Southport, supuestamente por un hombre de 17 años de ascendencia ruandesa.
"Cualquier cosa falsa que hayan inventado en Southport"... lo siento, James, ese es un comentario enfermizo y repugnante en este momento... has perdido un fan.
No tengo idea de si este fan 'David' es quien dice ser. En momentos como este, cualquier artículo que cuestione la narrativa oficial tiende a verse inundado de robots de los servicios de inteligencia que siembran dudas y división. Pero démosle el beneficio de la duda, supongamos que es real y disipemos sus preocupaciones.
David: Realmente no eres la única persona que encuentra el asesinato de inocentes, especialmente de niños, aborrecible, perturbador y sin sentido. Todos los demás también lo hacen. Es decir, todos los que no sean psicópatas. No eres especial. No estás al tanto de un grado peculiar de empatía y percepción del que otros, menos sensibles, son cruelmente deficientes. Simplemente estás respondiendo de la manera que John Donne describió cuando escribió:
Any man’s death diminisheth me because I am involved with mankind.
La muerte de cualquier hombre me disminuye porque estoy involucrado con la humanidad.
La última vez que cité esa frase tan citada fue en el momento de la supuesta masacre del 7 de octubre en Gaza. [https://delingpole.substack.com/p/israel-and-palestine-this-time-it?]
En aquella ocasión, la historia que dominaba los titulares se refería al asesinato de decenas de bebés muertos a quienes, según nos dijeron, habían sido degollados por brutales terroristas de Hamás.
Posteriormente se supo que la historia era una total invención, probablemente por parte de los departamentos de propaganda de siguiente nivel de Israel, deseosos de llevar a los medios de comunicación del mundo al deseado estado de frenética indignación.
Como dice el periódico israelí Haaretz: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-05/ty-article-magazine/deepfakes-from-the-gaza-war-increase-fears-about-ais-power-to-mislead - informó sobre el uso de imágenes y vídeos falsos (por ambas partes, afirmó) para manipular las emociones de las personas:
“Cuanto más aborrecible sea la imagen, más probabilidades habrá de que un usuario la recuerde y la comparta, propagando aún más la desinformación sin darse cuenta."Ahora mismo se le dice a la gente: miren esta foto de un bebé", dijo Ahmed. "La desinformación está diseñada para que usted se comprometa con ella".
Estoy seguro de que todos los David que hay por ahí (los reales, no sólo los agentes de inteligencia con penes trágicamente pequeños, demasiado gruesos incluso para carne de cañón que trabajan para la 77.ª Brigada) se habrían enfadado mucho si hubieras intentado explicarlo en ese momento. que estaban siendo engañados y habían caído en uno de los trucos más antiguos del libro.
Pero lo fueron y lo hicieron. No espero ningún arrepentimiento o conciencia de sí mismos por parte de estos incautos en el corto plazo. Después de todo, estarán demasiado ocupados enojándose por las (probables) víctimas falsas de la próxima gran operación psicológica.
Como siempre, ¿se equivoca alguna vez la chica? - La maravillosa Miriaf está conmigo en esto. https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/the-whole-of-the-moon?
Lo primero que tenemos que reconocer es que ninguno de nosotros sabe realmente con certeza qué pasó. Yo no y tú tampoco, pero si el evento ha provocado en ti una fuerte respuesta emocional, entonces es aún menos probable que puedas evaluarlo de manera imparcial y precisa.
"¡¿Qué quieres decir con imparcialidad, monstruo? ¡¿No sabes que acaban de morir niños?!"
No, en realidad no lo sé, y tú tampoco. Sólo sabemos que los medios nos han dicho que sí.
¿Realmente murieron?
Por supuesto, es completamente posible y plausible que lo hicieran. Es devastador que cada día mueran niños y, a veces, en circunstancias horribles y brutales. Obviamente, esto es siempre una tragedia indescriptible para ellos y sus seres queridos.
La cruda verdad es, sin embargo, que cada vez que un niño sufre una muerte violenta (y los niños asesinados suelen ser asesinados por sus padres o padrastros) no toda la nación se alza en armas al respecto.
Esto se debe a que generalmente no lo sabemos, y generalmente no lo sabemos, porque los medios generalmente no nos lo dicen, y cuando lo hacen, generalmente son unos pocos párrafos cortos en las últimas páginas, no en portadas sensacionalistas. noticias de la página en todas partes.
* * *
Here is a comment from an earlier piece I wrote expressing scepticism about a widely reported story concerning the alleged slaughter of young Taylor Swift fans in Southport, supposedly by a 17 year old man of Rwandan heritage.
“Whatever fake thing they have cooked up in Southport”….sorry James that is a sick and disgusting comment right now…you have lost a fan
I have no idea whether this fan ‘David’ is who he claims to be. At times like this, any articles questioning the official narrative tend to get swamped with intelligence service bots sowing doubt and division. But let’s give him the benefit of the doubt, assume he is real, and allay his concerns.
David: you really aren’t the only person out there who finds the murder of innocents, children especially, abhorrent, upsetting and senseless. Everybody else does too. Everyone, that is, who is not a psychopath. You are not special. You are not privy to a peculiar degree of empathy and insight in which others, less sensitive, are cruelly deficient. You are just responding in the way that John Donne described when he wrote:
Any man’s death diminisheth me because I am involved with mankind.
The last time I quoted that oft-cited line was at the time of the alleged October 7th massacre in Gaza. [https://delingpole.substack.com/p/israel-and-palestine-this-time-it?]
On that occasion, the story dominating the headlines concerned the murder of dozens of dead babies who - we were told - had had their throats cut by brutal Hamas terrorists.
The story, it subsequently emerged, was a total fabrication - likely by Israel’s next-level propaganda departments keen to whip the world’s media into the desired state of frenzied outrage.
As the Israel newspaper Haaretz - https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-05/ty-article-magazine/deepfakes-from-the-gaza-war-increase-fears-about-ais-power-to-mislead - reported on the use of fake images and videos (by both sides, it claimed) to manipulate people’s emotions:
“The more abhorrent the image, the more likely a user is to remember it and to share it, unwittingly spreading the disinformation further.
‘People are being told right now: look at this picture of a baby’, Ahmed said. ‘The disinformation is designed to make you engage with it.’
I’m sure all the Davids out there - real ones, not just tragically small penised intelligence operatives, too-thick-even-for-cannon-fodder working for 77th Brigade - would have got jolly upset had you tried to explain at the time that they were being played and had fallen for one of the oldest tricks in the book.
But they were and they did. I don’t expect any contrition or self-awareness from these dupes any time soon. After all, they’ll be far too busy getting worked up about the (likely) fake victims of the next big psyop.
As usual - is the girl ever wrong? - the wonderful Miriaf is with me on this. https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/the-whole-of-the-moon?
The first thing we have to acknowledge is that none of us really know for sure what happened. I don't and you don't, but if the event has provoked a strong emotional response in you, then you're even less likely to be able to assess it impartially and accurately.
"What do you mean impartially, you monster! Don't you know that children have just died?!"
No, I don't know that, actually, and nor do you. We only know the media has told us they have.
Did they really die?
Of course it's entirely possible and plausible that they did. Devastatingly, children die every day, and sometimes in horrific, brutal circumstances. This is - obviously - always an unspeakable tragedy for them and their loved ones.
The stark truth is, however, that every time a child meets a violent death - and children who are murdered are most often killed by parents or step-parents - the whole nation isn't up in arms about it.
That's because we don't generally know about it, and we don't generally know about it, because the media doesn't generally tell us, and when it does, it's usually a few short paragraphs on the back pages, not sensationalist front page news everywhere.
Miri’s piece applies, of course, not just to Southport but also to Gaza, the Manchester Arena ‘bombing’ [Do read Iain Davis’s superb coverage of the showtrial of Richard D Hall, the researcher who was all over that nonsense
and indeed to every other incident heavily promoted in the mainstream media in which innocent people (especially if they are children) are murdered or maimed.
Really it should be printed out on a card so that we can carry around in our pockets ready to flash in the face of anyone who looks across at us piteously from their newspaper or TV screen and tries to engage us in the emotional psychodrama of the latest, murdered babies du jour fabrication.
I say ‘fabrication.’ Obviously, as Miriaf - who is much more sensible than me - correctly points out, we cannot be sure in any given instance whether on this occasion real people were killed or not. What we can and should do, though, every time another of these incidents grabs the headlines (and there’s your first clue by the way) is too look out for the ‘tells’.
Among the obvious tells in this Southport story are: the invocation of Taylor Swift (he’s a wrong ‘un, for sure); the bizarre Rwandan connection (ties in with Normies’ idea about where all those machete-wielding immigrants should properly be sent); the deeply unconvincing interviews given by the supposed witnesses and relatives; the suspiciously quickly set up GoFundMe operations (which, as Miriaf correctly observes, are how participants in these alleged psyops are generally rewarded for their duplicity); and the way the event was successfully used by various dubious media players and influencers to persuade a bunch of idiots to attack a mosque (why?), and then, after that, to enable Cabal Manchurian Candidate Keir Starmer to prepare the ground for the closure of ‘far-right’ channels like Telegram.
And lots of you fell for it. Including the woman on my Telegram channel who protested “But they’ve named the children.”
Yes, they always name the children. Remember little Saffie Rose Roussos [note the three names] from the Manchester Arena bombing?
